Mother Decides She Doesn’t Want Her/Surrogate’s Baby

Thursday, August 7, 2008

One of my top ten posts on this site is Oprah’s Favorite Things in which I talked about how the “Favorite Things” show makes me cringe. (See the post if you want to know why.) In the post I made an off-hand remark about how the show on Surrogate Mothers in India made me cringe too as did Oprah’s remark that wealthy women using poor women in India to bear their children was “Women helping Women.” Perhaps also one of Oprah’s Favorite things. I didn’t discuss it further and said “That is another post for another day.”

It appears that day has arrived.

At least one user of Indian Surrogates considers it to be a situation in which changing your mind is an option. I continue to feel extremely uneasy about the whole business for many reasons. It is feeling more like women exploiting women to me.

Read on:

Baby born to surrogate Indian mother in legal limbo

by Sangeeta Sharma Wed Aug 6, 8:25 AM ET

JODHPUR (AFP) – The future of a 12-day-old baby girl born to an Indian surrogate mother hung in legal limbo Wednesday after the Japanese couple who planned to take her home divorced.

Manji Yamada was born last month after eggs from an Indian donor were fertilised using the Japanese man’s sperm and implanted in the womb of the surrogate Indian mother.

Her biological father split from his wife after the fertilisation process, and his former spouse no longer wants the baby.

In the absence of a surrogacy law in India, the child — who is an Indian citizen — will have to be adopted by her Japanese father Ikufumi Yamada, 45.

But Indian law does not allow the adoption of a girl by a single father, lawyers and doctors said.

“There is a legal complication as the father is alone and Indian adoption law says a single male can’t adopt a girl,” Sanjay Arya, the doctor who is looking after the baby, told AFP by phone from western Jaipur city.

Manji cannot leave the country without a passport and is being looked after in Jaipur by her paternal grandmother and an Indian friend of the father.

“Yamada went to the local passport office. He was told to go to the Japanese Embassy, which asked him to get a document from an Indian court to get custody of the child,” Arya said.

“He felt like a football.”

The baby’s father and grandmother were present at the hospital for her birth. Yamada has since returned to work in Japan, and is expected to come back to India after some headway has been made.

“I spoke to him today. He can’t plan anything till the baby’s passport is made,” said Ikufumi’s friend, Kamal Vijayvargiya, who consulted legal experts.

Arya, the doctor, said lawyers would file a court petition on Thursday seeking adoption by the father and temporary custody of the child by the grandmother till then.

“The surrogacy doesn’t matter. He is, after all, the biological father,” the doctor said.

Manji was born on July 25 in western Gujarat state. The child’s father, identified by the Indian media as a Tokyo surgeon, moved her to Jaipur city in Rajasthan state after serial bomb attacks in Gujarat in which some 50 people died.

“The baby is alright, but the grandmother is very tense,” and wants to take the infant back to Japan as soon as possible, Arya said.

The baby’s fate made front-page news in Indian dailies.

“Conceived in Japan, stuck in Jaipur” read the headline of the largest-selling English daily, The Times of India, saying the baby could become the country’s “first surrogate orphan” if the problems were not resolved.

“With India emerging as a destination for surrogate pregnancies, a law (to regulate surrogacy) will have to be brought into effect,” leading lawyer Indira Jaising told the Indian Express newspaper.

Critics call the practice “wombs for rent,” but surrogacy has emerged as a booming business in India.

Gujarat’s Anand town — where the baby was born — has emerged as India’s surrogacy centre after the high-profile case of a woman who gave birth to her own grandchildren on behalf of her British-based daughter in 2004.

Surrogate mothers in Anand charge about 100,000 rupees (2,500 dollars) for a pregnancy and have been approached by a number of overseas Indian and foreign couples who can have a surrogate baby at a fraction of the cost in Western countries.

Surrogate mothers are often poor women who opt to carry a stranger’s baby to help pay education and housing costs for their own families.


Oprah’s Favorite Things

Wednesday, July 16, 2008

I was cruising around itunes the other day and came across Kathy Griffin’s best selling comedy album, For Your Consideration. I listened to a short clip about Oprah. Kathy says she loves Oprah, watches her everyday, but basically thinks she is full of it. I don’t feel as strongly as she does. I watch Oprah on occasion when the subject matter of the show interests me and, I think she does some good things in the world. She and I share a few struggles. But, one show that she does regularly makes me cringe. (Well the show on surrogate mothers in India made me cringe too, as did Oprah’s remark that it was a show about “Women helping women.” but that is another topic for another day.)

The show that always makes me cringe is Oprah’s Favorite Things. Judging by the audiece reaction when they find out they are at the favorite things show, I may be in the minority here. They go nuts. Their eyes light up. They shout and scream. They oooh and awe as each new piece of merchandise is brought out onto the stage. It is this display that really bothers me. I find it – to resort to a very old fashioned word – unseemly. It smells of greed. It smells of a culture based on who can acquire the most stuff. A shallow culture, some might say. A manifestation of the problem right there on your screen, some might say.

Ask Suze Ormand. When she is on Oprah, she says “Americans are going broke buying things they don’t need to impress people they don’t know.” This show feeds right into that. No doubt the companies who provided the merchandise are happy. Getting mentioned on Oprah has got to generate more than a few sales as any publisher will tell you. And you know if I were in the audience, I not sure I wouldn’t just pile the stuff up under my seat along with everyone else and take it home but boy when I watch that Oprah’s favorite things show it makes me feel uneasy, uncomfortable and I have to turn it off. It is not a very attractive display.

I picture those who are not too happy with America right now pointing to this show and saying, “You see, we are right. Look at these people.”

I think I heard Oprah say recently that she wanted to stop doing that kind of show but her staff talked her into it again. Oprah, as a wise woman once said “Listen to your gut.”

Peace

UM


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 26 other followers